
My view on the election is still....................NOTHING !
Except..................if only this would happen..............
It came as racial tensions grow in the country as it prepares to introduce a total ban on burkas and other forms of religious dress which cover the face.

At one point the lawyer, who was out with her daughter, is said to have likened the Muslim woman to Belphegor, a horror demon character well known to French TV viewers. Belphegor is said to haunt the Louvre museum in Paris and frequently covers up his hideous features using a mask.
An argument started before the older woman is said to have ripped the other woman's veil off. As they came to blows, the lawyer's daughter joined in."The shop manager and the husband of the Muslim woman moved to break up the fighting," the officer said. All three were arrested and taken to the local gendarmerie for questioning.
A spokesman for Trignac police said that two complaints had been received, with the Muslim woman accusing the lawyer of racial and religious assault. The latter, in turn, had accused her opponent of common assault.
The French parliament has adopted a formal motion declaring burkas and other forms of Islamic dress to be "an affront to the nation's values." Some have accused criminals, from terrorists to shoplifters, of wearing veils to disguise themselves.
A ban, which could be introduced as early as the autumn, would make France the second country after Belgium to outlaw the Islamic veil in public places.
But many have criticised the anti-burka lobby, which includes the French President Nicolas Sarkozy, for stigmatising Muslim housewives.
Many French woman from council estates are forced to wear the veils because of pressure from authoritarian husbands.
The promise of a ban has prompted warnings of racial tensions in a country which is home to some five million Muslims – one of the religion's largest communities in Europe.
Mr Sarkozy's cabinet is to examine a draft bill which will impose one-year prison sentences and fines of up to £14,000 on men who force their wives to wear a burka.
Women themselves will face a smaller fine of just over £100 because they are "often victims with no choice in the matter", says the draft.
The law would create a new offence of "incitement to cover the face for reasons of gender".
And it would state: "No one may wear in public places clothes that are aimed at hiding the face."

Simon Cowell's girlfriend, Mezhgan Hussainy's family wants music mogul Simon Cowell to convert to Islam before he marries her, says a report.
The 'American Idol' judge had proposed to Hussainy last week.
'They're very westernised, but no one in their family has ever married a non-Muslim - and they're not willing for their youngest daughter to become the first,' digitalspy.co.uk quoted a source as saying about Hussainy's parents Mary and Sayed.
Hussainy's sister-in-law Erlene Garcia was also asked to convert before marrying her brother Wahid.
According to Hussainy's friend, 'Mezhgan is very reluctant about asking Simon to convert...and she knows how controversial it will be.'

For public consumption, the incoming Labour Government's line could hardly have been clearer.
"Every country must have firm control over immigration,' said Tony Blair's 1997 manifesto, 'and Britain is no exception."
Behind the scenes, however, a very different strategy was taking shape.
An explosive draft report by the Cabinet Office, written in 2000, exposes the new Government's deliberate policy of throwing open our borders.
Crucially, this was not, as it was sold to voters, simply to fill the skills gaps opening up in our then-booming economy.
As the hitherto secret report confirms, the calculated aim was also to transform Britain into a fully multicultural society.
In the blunt words of a loose-tongued Labour adviser who worked on the report, it was to 'rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date'.
Of course, some will argue that multiculturalism is indeed a worthy end in itself - although you won't often hear that said in places such as Reading, where 127 languages are spoken in schools.
But in a democracy, don't ministers have a duty to tell us what they are up to and why - and to let our votes be the judges?
Of all Labour's legacies, the effects of ten years of unrestricted immigration will surely be the most lasting.
My Opinion: Hang the Bastard !
England's "Scottish" Prime Minister to sell White Cliffs of Dover to France
But now, thanks to Britain's Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, the White Cliffs of Dover are to be sold to England's ancient enemy and great rival - France.
The cliffs have always had a symbolic value for England, and then Britain, because they face Continental Europe, where invasions from nations such as Spain, France and Germany have historically threatened.
A jailed killer poured boiling oil over another inmate because he refused to
convert to Islam.
Jamaile Morally 26, a member of the gang that kidnapped, raped and murdered Mary-Ann Leneghan sentenced to life for his evil part of a gang that also raped and tortured another teenage girl and left her for dead, led two other inmates in carrying out the attack.
They boiled up the oil in a kitchen at high-security Whitemoor Prison, March, Cambs, and poured it over Durwayne Martin, 26, scalding his neck, shoulders and back.
A prison source said: "There has been a real problem of extremist Muslims trying to convert other inmates to Islam."
My Opinion: Hang the BASTARD !


“He should have been put away for a very long time. At 13 he would have known what he was doing was wrong and if he wasn’t aware then he won’t be in three years either.
“Our justice system is too soft on people. Nobody is standing up for the victims.”
Yvonne Traynor, who leads South London’s Rape and Sexual Abuse Support Centre, said: “I wonder how our society moved from 14-year-old boys supporting a football team and going to scouts to robbery and raping women.”
Judge Paul Glenn lifted a restriction preventing the publication of Khan’s name after hearing details of the horrifying attack at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court.
The court was told how Khan ran up behind his victim and grabbed her around the neck as she walked through a secluded area near Cobridge, in Stoke one evening last September. He punched and kicked her as she lay on the ground before raping her.
The court heard two boys, aged 10 and 11, who knew Khan, stood nearby and shouted at him to stop the attack.
Afterwards Khan, from Cobridge, took the victim’s bag, containing an iPod and mobile phone.
The court heard scientists later found Khan’s DNA on swabs taken from the victim. Naomi Perry, defending, said he had shown remorse for what he had done.
“We are dealing with a very immature young man,” she said. “He has been having anger-management classes and he feels these have helped him.”
Judge Paul Glenn told Khan that his offences were “grave” and that an adult convicted of the same crimes would have been jailed for eight or nine years.
He added: “It was a terrifying experience for this young woman and she will be left psychologically scarred.”
By law, anyone under 18 years old faces a lesser sentence for rape than an adult, and for those aged 14 or under the term is reduced further.
Khan was sentenced to three years in a young offenders’ institution.
Balal Khan, now 14 but 13 at the time of the attack, was spared a longer term because of his age – and because he said sorry.Khan, one of the UK’s youngest convicted rapists, targeted his 20-year-old victim as she walked home.
He beat her severely, then screamed: “Do what I say or I’ll kill you”, before putting her through the terrifying sex attack.
He finally stole her bag and phone and even answered a call from her boyfriend – to brag about what he had done.
My Opinion: Public Execution!



It has also emerged that two male Arab nationals were refused permission to board planes from Heathrow Airport to the United States earlier this month after their names appeared on a US "no fly list".
The first incident happened last Saturday when British officials refused to allow an Egyptian man permission to fly on American Airlines flight from Heathrow to Miami.
The following day a Saudi Arabian passenger was stopped from boarding United Airlines flight to Chicago. Officials said the man was sent back to Saudi Arabia by British immigration officials (that'll be a first, normally they give them a welfare/benefit cheque and a 3 bedroom council house) !

Just a final note, I would like to add with some degree of "intelligence" that I dont think these somali muslms would fall within the category of "clear skins"..............lol

Tablighi Jamaat, the Islamic sect behind the proposal, is to be evicted this week from the East London site, where it has been operating illegally a temporary mosque and had planned a complex that would accommodate 12,000 worshippers.
The Muslim Council of Britain said that the group had fallen victim to “unfounded hostility and hysteria”.
However, another Muslim organisation last night welcomed the move. Minhaj-ul-Quran, which advises the Government on how to combat youth radicalisation, said that a mosque should be a “community effort” and not the initiative of one group with extremist links.
Newham Council is now considering compulsory purchase of the land after Tablighi Jamaat, whose strict interpretation of Islam has caused concern, failed to lodge a masterplan of its vision. There was strong opposition when the sect unveiled its plans for the site, south of the London 2012 Olympic Park, in 2007. More than 48,000 people petitioned the Government to prevent the development, dubbed the “mega-mosque”.
Although Tablighi Jamaat had publicly vowed to press on with its vision, there has been no activity on the project since last summer.
The Times understands that its architects are not actively working on the plans and a company hired to win over the public is no longer formally engaged. Newham Council’s planning officers have not spoken to the mosque trust for several months.
Newham Council confirmed that it issued enforcement notices against the trust on Thursday. The makeshift mosque on the West Ham site has been operating illegally since temporary planning permission lapsed more than three years ago.
A spokesman said that action was taken because the trust missed its final deadline, earlier this month, to lodge a masterplan.The council was investigating all options, including compulsory purchase.
Observers portray Tablighi Jamaat as a strict movement intent on spreading its version of Islam. British terrorists have had associations with the organisation and intelligence agencies have expressed fears that al-Qaeda was using membership as cover to network with extremists in the US.
Founded in India in 1927, it has 80 million followers. It “utterly refutes any links to terrorism or terrorists”.
Campaigners welcomed the outcome, saying that the proposed mosque — which would have held four times as many worshippers as Britain’s largest Anglican cathedral — was inappropriate. Alan Craig, a councillor representing the Christian Peoples’ Alliance, said: “It would have given a huge national platform, right by the Olympics, for them to promote their ideology.”
However, Inayat Bunglawala, a spokesman for the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “We would hope that they will be able to work in co-operation with the local council if they wish to set up a mosque in the area. Tablighi Jamaat has no ties to terrorism. They have been subjected to some unfair coverage.”
The mosque trust has refused to comment.
The news comes as the Islamic group Minhaj-ul-Quran releases in Britain a 600-page document condemning terrorism.
The fatwa, written by Dr Muhammed Tahir-ul-Qadri, a former minister of Pakistan and friend of Benazir Bhutto, declares suicide bombings and terrorism as unIslamic. It is one of the most comprehensive documents of its kind to be published in Britain. Released in Pakistan last month, the fatwa uses texts in the Koran and other Islamic writings to argue that such attacks are “absolutely against the teachings of Islam and that Islam does not permit such acts on any excuse, reason or pretext”.

Gordon Brown was snubbed by badly injured Afghan veterans when they closed curtains round their beds during a hospital visit and refused to speak to him.
More than half the soldiers being treated at the Selly Oak hospital ward in Birmingham either asked for the curtains to be closed or deliberately avoided the prime minister, according to several of those present. 
The soldiers, who have sustained some of the worst injuries seen in Afghanistan, described his visit as “opportunistic” and a “waste of time”.
Furious about equipment shortages and poor compensation for their injuries, one soldier said: “It is almost as if we are the product of an unwanted affair ... he has done nothing for us.”
Brown visited the military wing of Selly Oak on September 2, where about 25 wounded soldiers were being treated. They were told about the visit in the morning and asked by nurses if they wanted to speak to him.
Sapper Matthew Weston, 20, is one of the most seriously injured soldiers to have survived. He lost both legs and his right arm when a bomb exploded on a dirt track outside Sangin.
He said: “I didn’t want to speak to him, I didn’t want to waste my time talking to someone who was just trying to make themselves look good. I spent the day with my family instead. 
“Half the lads didn’t want to speak to him and those that did pretty much blamed him for everything. Many of the lads just closed their curtains and hid themselves away.
“I met Prince Charles and Sir Richard Dannatt [when they visited Selly Oak]. I have respect for them. Prince Charles spoke to me for two hours. I really didn’t want to speak to Gordon Brown.”
Another soldier, who suffered severe injuries when caught in a mine explosion, left the hospital in an attempt to avoid Brown.
He was angry at the government’s attempt to cut compensation payouts for injured soldiers. He said: “I went outside for a fag but when I came back he was still there. Most of us said we wouldn’t like to see him so we drew our curtains and waited for him to go.
“It was a pretty sour thing, we feel a lot of bitterness towards Gordon Brown. The guys read the papers, it is obvious to them that he doesn’t care. Many of us felt like it was an effort to accommodate him.
“At the time the Ministry of Defence were trying to sue wounded British soldiers to cut their compensation. It was so wrong. It doesn’t give the guys any faith in the government, it doesn’t make us feel like they support us or look after us.
“The lads didn’t say much after the visit. Some were grateful he had bothered to come up to see us, others were saying they wished they could have thumped him.”
Another soldier, who lost his right leg after being caught in a mine blast in Afghanistan, said that more than two-thirds of the 25 soldiers on the ward closed their curtains. He, however, decided to speak to Brown.
“I wanted to find out how the guy’s head worked,” he said. “I was interested in what he had made of his trip to Afghanistan and what he had learnt from it.
“I feel that e
ven if someone is a moron, he should have the opportunity to defend his moronity. [His response] all seemed rather textbook and not from the heart.
“It is quite obvious to anyone that Brown is not concerned, it is almost as if we [the soldiers] are the product of an unwanted affair.
“The straight fact is this: we don’t like the man, he has done nothing for us and continues to kick us in the teeth over equipment and compensation.”
The most severely wounded troops are flown from the front line to Selly Oak for treatment, often within 12 hours of being operated on by teams of surgeons in Camp Bastion. The hospital has a specialist, 32-bed military-run ward to help soldiers recover from their injuries alongside other servicemen.
The concerns of the wounded soldiers appear to highlight a disconnection between front line troops in Afghanistan and Brown and his government. Earlier this year an official report suppressed by ministers revealed that soldiers’ lives were being put at risk by “endemic” failures at the Ministry of Defence.
It blamed a “political fudge” and Whitehall incompetence for the failure to provide soldiers in Afghanistan with adequate equipment, and said bungled projects were £35 billion over budget.
At the same time Brown has been accused of failing to give adequate funding to the military. As chancellor he oversaw a dramatic increase in government expenditure on education, welfare and health while the defence budget fell from 2.8% of GDP to 2.2%.
The cuts have continued since he became prime minister. In October he was forced to backtrack over plans to impose a £17.5m cut in the Territorial Army’s training budget, while a month earlier the government took two injured soldiers to court in a test case that would have slashed compensation payments to injured soldiers.
The failings are damaging the morale of troops on the front line. According to a survey of 10,500 Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force personnel, published in August, the majority of servicemen and women feel morale is low, singling out equipment shortages as one of their biggest concerns.
Two days after his visit to Selly Oak, Brown paid tribute to injured soldiers during a speech in London. He said: “There is nothing more heartbreaking than, as I did this week, meeting a teenager who has lost a leg.”
Yesterday a spokesman for the prime minister said: “The prime minister regularly visits wounded service personnel. He has the utmost respect and admiration for the soldiers’ sacrifice, bravery and dignity. As you would expect, we never comment on the PM’s private visits to injured soldiers.”



be done soon enough.





Canterbury Lord Carey (pictured left), recently stated on a Radio 5 show that " Christians must toughen up and speak out" and that he also called for the immigration system to prioritise immigrants who respect Britain’s historic Christian values.
Muslims. There are enough mosques for Muslims in this country. They don’t need any more.” Also, in an interview with Premier Christian Radio, she added: “We don’t need to have sharia law, which would come with more mosques imposed upon our nation.
but as usual with the BBC (like with the Question Time farce with the Nick Griffin), the audience then proceeded to ridicule her brave comments, shocking outbursts that came from the usual rag bag fundamentalist left wing lunatic appeasers and muslims that I'm sure the BBC carefully select for the show. Muslims in the audience were incensed by her comments and that of Lord Carey. I'm sure given the chance, they would have beheaded her there and then given the chance the affore mentioned rag bag bunch would have jeered the muslims on, not realising that their heads were definately next on the block for being non believers or Gay and that of course Alison Ruoof WAS RIGHT !
With regards to the 2nd show question though, which I found funny. What did we then have from the muslims selected for the audience...........? A deafening sound of silence, because we all know what the islamic belief is about homosexuality & non believers and I doubt the BBC would want to disclose that or upset the selected muslim audience now would they? allahu akbah BBC !!!







